- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 12:55:26 +0200
- To: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
- Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, www-style@w3.org, <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
On Monday, May 9, 2005, 12:50:56 PM, Henry wrote: HST> Chris Lilley writes: >> So, to be clear, you are suggesting that the CSS spec describe the DTD, >> W3C XML Schema, and xml:id methods and then have a similar general >> clause about 'other methods'? HST> Personally I would settle for DTD and W3C XML Schema in some detail, HST> refer to 'other/external methods' and give xml:id as an e.g. That would be suboptimal, for example there would be no conformance requirement and thus no xml:id samples in the test suite. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead
Received on Monday, 9 May 2005 10:55:33 UTC