Orion Adrian schrieb: > My mother, who isn't involved in this debate, has stated on several > occasions that she loves what Microsoft did when they became a > monopoly. I asked her why and her answer was surprising. She said that > when Microsoft became the standard, everything worked. She no longer > had to worry about this working or that working. She no longer had to > deal with multiple programs trying to interoperate: everything just > worked. > > This is still the foundation of Microsoft development. It is their > slogan and it appears on their products: "Play for Sure". Users don't > care about how developers do it, they only care that they do. They > hate that there are subtle or major differences between applications. > They don't understand it and they don't care. From a typical user's > perspective, IE is correct and Mozilla, Opera and Safari are broken. > Why? Because features work on IE that don't work elsewhere. Is this > because authors coded for IE? YES!, but it's a moot point since users > only care about sucess. My father is also not involved in this debate, and he is very happy with his new sans-Microsoft OS, everything he needs works very stable (and I can support him more efficiently). So what's your point? ;) TonicoReceived on Thursday, 30 June 2005 19:32:59 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:38 GMT