On 6/30/05, Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au> wrote: > > Orion Adrian wrote: > > XSLT, of which I am a fan is a translation language. It isn't really a > > styling language despite the name. > > XSLT is just one part of XSL. XSL-FO is probably more like what you're > after. > No, it's not. XSL-FO is another train wreck altogether. I'm not looking for something so complex. I'm a fan of the simple specification. Bringing in the mostly non-implemented XSL-FO would be too much of a hardship. I'm looking for a way to specify layout independant of content that supports incremental rendering, no reflow and is easy to read/write/maintain. I think I found a solution to do that. Orion AdrianReceived on Thursday, 30 June 2005 05:09:18 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:38 GMT