- From: Orion Adrian <orion.adrian@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 01:09:15 -0400
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 6/30/05, Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au> wrote: > > Orion Adrian wrote: > > XSLT, of which I am a fan is a translation language. It isn't really a > > styling language despite the name. > > XSLT is just one part of XSL. XSL-FO is probably more like what you're > after. > No, it's not. XSL-FO is another train wreck altogether. I'm not looking for something so complex. I'm a fan of the simple specification. Bringing in the mostly non-implemented XSL-FO would be too much of a hardship. I'm looking for a way to specify layout independant of content that supports incremental rendering, no reflow and is easy to read/write/maintain. I think I found a solution to do that. Orion Adrian
Received on Thursday, 30 June 2005 05:09:18 UTC