W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > June 2005

Re: [CSS2.1] Counters

From: Staffan Mhln <staffan.mahlen@comhem.se>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 18:31:15 +0200
To: www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <42B316F3.25196.A629029@localhost>

On 16 Jun 2005 at 8:39, L. David Baron wrote:
> > The second problem could perhaps be addressed in the
> > definition of the counters function, by making it not include the
> > "initital" reset.
> Although that rule would require an exception for when the root reset is
> the only one in scope.  It's simpler to avoid exceptions on exceptions.

Yes, but i was thinking that wasn't going to be needed. Using
'counters' without resetting seems less likely while 'counter' 
could perhaps use the "error recovery".

Received on Friday, 17 June 2005 16:31:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:27:18 UTC