On 16 Jun 2005 at 8:39, L. David Baron wrote: > > The second problem could perhaps be addressed in the > > definition of the counters function, by making it not include the > > "initital" reset. > > Although that rule would require an exception for when the root reset is > the only one in scope. It's simpler to avoid exceptions on exceptions. Yes, but i was thinking that wasn't going to be needed. Using 'counters' without resetting seems less likely while 'counter' could perhaps use the "error recovery". /StaffanReceived on Friday, 17 June 2005 16:31:13 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:37 GMT