Re: Supporting propriety "Extensions"

Jonny Axelsson wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 10:49:24 +0100, Werner Donné <werner.donne@re.be>  
> wrote:
> 
>> In my opinion the proposed mechanism for property extensions
>> sets up a parallel namespace scheme. At some point there even
>> will have to be a prefix registration body as well.
> 
> 
> This extension mechanism is similar to, slightly better than, the "X-"  
> extension mechanism used in IETF, which is working fine. You are 
> arguing  for a vnd-tree which there is no use-case for.
> 

Not right now maybe, but how far in the future do you have to look to
see a use-case for it?

-- 
Werner Donné  --  Re BVBA
Engelbeekstraat 8
B-3300 Tienen
tel: (+32) 486 425803	e-mail: werner.donne@re.be

Received on Wednesday, 23 February 2005 10:48:17 UTC