- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 12:40:09 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Anne van Kesteren <fora@annevankesteren.nl>
- Cc: W3C CSS List <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > Ian Hickson wrote: > > On Sun, 13 Feb 2005, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > > If the 'content' property in terms of CSS 3 UI really is the same > > > as in CSS 2.1 only extended with a new value it should read > > > "pseudo-element" not "(pseudo-)element"[1]. > > > > In CSS3, 'content' will apply to elements. > > css3-ui does not define that and does not depend on any module that > defines that. (Like, for example, css3-content.) So? The clause is just making sure it doesn't contradict something that it doesn't define. I don't understand the problem. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 14 February 2005 12:40:12 UTC