> E.g. the CSS selector 'a b' is a very cheap operation, while the XPath > equivalent 'a//b' is a very expensive one. Actually they're exactly the same thing. XPath and CSS selectors are neither targeting nor selecting. CSS uses a matching alorithm _XSL:T_ using a selecting one. The problem is that even XPath has expensive axes to implement using a matching algorithm. What has been asked in the past is that XPath be used in CSS, either with the full set of axes or a limited set of axes that allow for inexpensive calculation. -- Orion AdrianReceived on Monday, 12 December 2005 02:38:48 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:42 GMT