W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2005

Re: [css21] anonymous block boxes versus block boxes

From: Staffan Mhln <staffan.mahlen@comhem.se>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 16:59:34 +0200
Message-ID: <4315C5D6.7050409@comhem.se>
To: www-style@w3.org

L. David Baron wrote:
> On Monday 2005-08-15 18:16 +0200, Staffan Mhln wrote:
>>Oh. I found
>>Apparently people there agrees that "as high as possible" means 
>>including moving already positioned items. To me it seems that
> Otherwise, it doesn't, since if already positioned items were moved to
> make room for the float, then the position of the float would violate
> rule (5) or (6) in [1].

Yes i obviously missread the rec (CSS 2.1 even introduced changes to 
clarify this) and i worded the above poorly.

However, i still think that what Mozilla and IE does currently makes
more technical sense (for both authors and UAs) than what the rec states 
you should do.

It would IMHO be a good idea for the WG to consider changing this in CSS 
2.1, or perhaps in a future errata to CSS 2.1 if that works better 
process-wise, even if it is a very minor issue.

Received on Wednesday, 31 August 2005 14:59:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:27:20 UTC