- From: Craig Northway <craign@cisra.canon.com.au>
- Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 15:16:27 +0200
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Hi, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: >* Craig Northway wrote: > > >>>>Section 5.9 >>>> >>>>The example in section 5.9 is not well formed XML. Please make this well >>>>formed XML (i.e. then it will probably be well formed XHTML!) >>>> >>>> >>>Yes, most HTML documents are not well-formed XML, so this seems to be >>>a duplicate of http://www.w3.org/mid/430DB80F.80504@cisra.canon.com.au >>> >>> >>Shouldn't the W3C be promoting the creation of well-formed documents? >> >> > >>From http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/ >it seems the answer is no... But this does not seem relevant here, >there is no well-defined notion of "well-formed" for HTML documents. > >If you mean whether W3C should promote use of HTML over XHTML then > > XHTML over HTML... >that might well be so but that's not the case at the moment. CSS is >more commonly used with HTML than with XHTML documents, it therefore >makes sense to include HTML examples in the CSS specifications. > > Aren't valid xhtml documents valid html documents? (in general). Craig
Received on Thursday, 25 August 2005 13:16:41 UTC