- From: Emrah BASKAYA <emrahbaskaya@hesido.com>
- Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 00:21:22 +0300
- To: "David Woolley" <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- Cc: "www-style.w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Sat, 13 Aug 2005 22:26:10 +0300, David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk> wrote: > >> the image. It is a problem in case the image doesn't load (as it is > > Or can't load. > > That's exactly why it doesn't fail gracefully. > It fails gracefully, as when you specify a stand-in color, that css code is ignored by older browsers, which can earlier be fed the proper background, I'm giving the example again, just in case. background: red; background: transparent standincolor(red) url(foo.png); Is something wrong with this? Or are you for: background: red; background: red onbgimageload(transparent) url(foo.png); Or you are not for any of these solutions? I would like to hear why this wouldn't degrade gracefully. -- Emrah BASKAYA www.hesido.com
Received on Saturday, 13 August 2005 21:21:34 UTC