W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2005

Re: css2.1 question

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 16:09:57 +0000 (UTC)
To: Adam Kuehn <akuehn@nc.rr.com>
Cc: Philip TAYLOR <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>, "Beton, Richard" <richard.beton@roke.co.uk>, www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0504271609260.18177@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>

On Wed, 27 Apr 2005, Adam Kuehn wrote:
> 
> I'll stop looking now, but Philip's example is not isolated. Frankly, I 
> don't see the need for this convention at all.  There is no ambiguity in 
> any of these fragments.

Fair enough. Maybe we should indeed just remove it.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 27 April 2005 16:10:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:36 GMT