- From: Anne van Kesteren <fora@annevankesteren.nl>
- Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 15:56:04 +0200
- To: Matthew Raymond <mattraymond@earthlink.net>
- CC: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>, W3C CSS <www-style@w3.org>
Matthew Raymond wrote: > I think you mean that the DOM property would be "text" while the > markup would have "date"... No, not true. The DOM property is 'date' obviously, otherwise this whole Web Forms thing wouldn't work. >> As a work around, you could possibly make use of a selector that is >> commonly supported by Web Forms 2 UAs, but not by non-Web Forms 2 >> UAs. Basically, you'll have to make use of a CSS filter of some >> kind. > > Something like this?: I think he meant just a hack, not some other proposal. >> However, this would fail for any UA that implements the selector >> used, but not web forms or vice versa. Not if your assumption was true that the DOM property contained 'text'. > I think script solutions should be avoided. Problems like this will > exist as long as HTML does, and it's likely to appear in XML > languages as well. I think this isn't a problem at all. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/>
Received on Tuesday, 5 April 2005 13:56:00 UTC