Re: [selectors] Tree selectors

Lachlan Hunt wrote:
> I think this would be equivlent to the proposed selector:
>   section:depth(2)
> (that is, if I understood :depth() correctly).

You want section:depth(2n) there, but there are all kinds of flaws 
unfortunately, as pointed out in the rest of the thread.


-- 
  Anne van Kesteren
  <http://annevankesteren.nl/>