W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2004

Re: ideas for future css versions ...

From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 16:20:38 +0200
Message-ID: <19928682.20040903162038@w3.org>
To: Matthew.van.Eerde@hbinc.com
Cc: ian@hixie.ch, thebrunger@yahoo.com, www-style@w3.org, Bert.Bos@sophia.inria.fr

On Thursday, September 2, 2004, 5:58:04 PM, Matthew wrote:


>> http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-color/#rgba-color
>> 
>> Already supported by Safari.

MvEhc> On that note: http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-color/#numerical says
MvEhc> "transparent" is short for rgba(0, 0, 0, 0).  Wouldn't it be better to
MvEhc> say it's short for rgba(255, 255, 255, 0)?

No - transparent is better as transparent black - no color and no
coverage.


-- 
 Chris Lilley                    mailto:chris@w3.org
 Chair, W3C SVG Working Group
 Member, W3C Technical Architecture Group
Received on Friday, 3 September 2004 14:20:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:32 GMT