Re: ideas for future css versions ...

On Thursday, September 2, 2004, 5:58:04 PM, Matthew wrote:


>> http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-color/#rgba-color
>> 
>> Already supported by Safari.

MvEhc> On that note: http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-color/#numerical says
MvEhc> "transparent" is short for rgba(0, 0, 0, 0).  Wouldn't it be better to
MvEhc> say it's short for rgba(255, 255, 255, 0)?

No - transparent is better as transparent black - no color and no
coverage.


-- 
 Chris Lilley                    mailto:chris@w3.org
 Chair, W3C SVG Working Group
 Member, W3C Technical Architecture Group