Re: Multiple Background Images

Good morning (or whatever other part of day), everyone.

> > I couldn't find any other property that would set a precedent for this
> > decision, but I think it would be most logical if they were painted from
> > top to bottom, in the order they appear.  ie. in the example, foo would
> > be painted on top of bar.

> Considering usual stacking order I would rather interpret it the other way
> round, foo at lowest level, followed by bar and any other image in order
> of appearance, much like layers are added on top of each other in image
> editing software.

In other words, the issue seems to regard the z-axis (depth/stack), not the y-axis (display height/flow).


Kind regards,

Brian Sexton