- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 03:13:52 -0400
- To: www-style@w3.org
Larry Israel wrote: > > 1. In terms of the nomenclature, words like "option" and "handling" add no > meaning in this context. Brevity is very important... I agree with this. > Maybe some further brainstorming would provide more-useful names? In the > spirit of brainstorming, maybe instead of "wrap-option", maybe word-wrap, > line-wrap, or text-wrap. And instead of "white-space-handling", maybe > spaces, or space-chars. The name wrap-option is inherited from XSL. I suppose we could change it; I will check with the XSL working group once the values are stable. As for white-space-sth, I'm considering these three: white-space-collapse: discard | preserve | collapse etc. white-space-discard: discard | preserve | collapse etc. white-space-preserve: discard | preserve | collapse etc. ~fantasai -- http://fantasai.inkedblade.net/contact
Received on Thursday, 21 October 2004 07:14:30 UTC