W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2004

Re: "active" CSS

From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 21:44:56 +0100 (BST)
Message-Id: <200410102044.i9AKiuP00615@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
To: www-style@w3.org

> OBJECT element (a common header, footer, or navigational document, for
> example) should replace the embedded document, its parent, the document at

That's behavioural, not structural.

> This seems to me a structural oversight--the ability to embed documents 
> without the ability to specify where their links open is a recipe for links 

Embedding is essentially presentational.  Structurally, for example,
img elements are really just a special sort of a element.  Much use of
img is purely presentational, e.g. text replacement, frame borders, etc.
Received on Sunday, 10 October 2004 20:44:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:34 GMT