Ben Ward's words: > >Another possible method for determining stacking order that I can > >think of off the top of my head would be to use something like > >background(1): url(image1.jpg); background(2): url(image2.jpg); > > The above would be my favoured method of representing multiple > backgrounds too. > I was going to submit such a suggestion myself a few weeks ago but > feared I was too late (and being new to www-style...). Anyway, since > it's come up, this was my theory: What about "background: 0([background-image] [background-position] ... [background-xxx]) 1([background-image] [background-position] ... [background-xxx]);"? That could work, too. I personally believe that background(0): url(blah.jpg); background(1): url(blah.jpg); would be more benificial and easier to understand, but the above might also be a strong possibility. I suppose it would depend on the author of that particular style sheet. Thanks, W. Leon Sutton, Jr. Hyponiq's Web Development Solutions - www.hyponiqs.comReceived on Tuesday, 23 November 2004 13:51:36 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:27:16 UTC