- From: Anne van Kesteren (fora) <fora@annevankesteren.nl>
- Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 06:28:16 +0200
- To: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>
- Cc: W3C Style List <www-style@w3.org>
>> Or: >> >> font-size:120%%; >> >> What is the calculated 'font-size'? So I also don't think it is >> worth doing investigation and write-up at all. > > > 120%% - the same rule as previous. > > Logicaly %% are applicable to entities already having 'auto' (free > space) concept. I can see that it could be applied to line-height. > But font-size? Possible, but has no physical meaning. font-size:120% > is not a percentage from container dimension, so %% have no meaning > here. And that is exactly why your proposal doesn't make sense ;-) >>> position: center as far as I can see it is about automatic >>> absolute positioning and has nothing common with block content >>> alignment. And no position: bottom, etc. >> >> There is no such thing as 'position:bottom'. Are you sure you have >> read and understood, the *complete* mail (proposal). > > Sorry, I mean: this proposal does not cover e.g. bottom auto > positioning case. Actually position:center is completely different > approach - it is about element positioning but not about content > alignment. It is about box alignment, not sure about content alignment though. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/>
Received on Friday, 21 May 2004 00:28:35 UTC