Re: vertical-align

Andrew Fedoniouk wrote:

> 1) To allow use of 'auto' value in padding attributes. So to align container
> content to bottom author may use:
> padding-top:auto; in container's style.

Isn't going to work. (Incosistent)


> 1-%%) To introduce %% units (sorry) as a most generic solution of vertical
> (and horizontal) auto positioning.

Isn't going to work. (Not solid)


> 2) To introduce content-vertical-align attribute for any arbitrary block. I
> don't like it personally. Too many inconsitencies.

Isn't going to work. (Not solid)


> Any other ideas? Or vertical alignment a "person non grata" and we don't
> need it at all?

'position:center' has been proposed a while ago in this list [1].

[1] <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2004Jan/0218.html>


-- 
  Anne van Kesteren
  <http://annevankesteren.nl/>