Re: where is overflow:none ? from David Woolley on 2004-05-18 (www-style@w3.org from May 2004)

From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 07:19:57 +0100 (BST)
To: www-style@w3.org
Message-Id: <200405180619.i4I6Jvn02157@djwhome.demon.co.uk>

> Seems like min-width: intrinsic will solve a problem and will satisfy
> everybody.

No.  You seem to be confusing min-width and width.  What you really seem
to want to do is to set a minimum width but have the actual width be
determined by the contents.  That is simply:

width: auto;
min-width: <Fedoniouk's definition width>

and you therefore don't need a new construct.

Received on Tuesday, 18 May 2004 02:37:38 UTC