W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2004

Re: where is overflow:none ?

From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 07:19:57 +0100 (BST)
Message-Id: <200405180619.i4I6Jvn02157@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
To: www-style@w3.org

> Seems like min-width: intrinsic will solve a problem and will satisfy
> everybody.

No.  You seem to be confusing min-width and width.  What you really seem
to want to do is to set a minimum width but have the actual width be
determined by the contents.  That is simply:

width: auto;
min-width: <Fedoniouk's definition width>

and you therefore don't need a new construct.
Received on Tuesday, 18 May 2004 02:37:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:30 GMT