W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2004

Re: where is overflow:none ?

From: Ernest Cline <ernestcline@mindspring.com>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 23:47:44 -0400
Message-ID: <410-22004521834744125@mindspring.com>
To: "Lachlan Hunt" <lachlan.hunt@iinet.net.au>, "W3C Style List" <www-style@w3.org>




> [Original Message]
> From: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@iinet.net.au>
>
>
> Andrew Fedoniouk wrote:
> > overflow:none has a clear logical sense (for me): in no circumstances
box
> > width or/and box height will be less than its content - read: will never
> > overflow.
>
>    It doesn't make any sense because the overflow:none would be 
> affecting the height/width of a box which is the job for the height and 
> width properties, whereas, currently, 'overflow' only affects how 
> content outside the box is rendered.
>
>    What would happen with the following code?
>
> p {
>    max-height: 2em;
>    max-width: 5em;
>    overflow: none;
> }
> ...
> <p>This is a long paragraph, that requires a box bigger than the 
> 'max-height' and 'max-width' properties allows...</p>
>
> The 'max-height' and 'max-width' properties say *do not* create a box 
> bigger than 10em x 2em, but the overflow property says *do not* create a 
> box smaller than the height/width required by the content.  So, since 
> the paragraph would obviously need a much bigger box than 10em x 2em, it 
> would seem that the max-height and -width properties are now conflicting 
> with the overflow property, thus what height would the box be?
>
>    To me, an intrinsic value for the height/width properties would make 
> much more sense.

Well, one could argue that it would call for the element to scaled until
it did fit into a 5em by 2 em box, but that seems like too much effort.
Besides, if such was a desired behavior, the 'fit' property would probably
be a better way to do it for replaced content, and adding new keyword
values for 'font-size' (such as the "fill" "meet" and "slice" from the 'fit'
property) to cause the text size to be adjusted to  for non-replaced
content would probably be more logical.  Of course, if bot width and
height are specified with respect to font size, scaling the font size won't
always work unless such measurements are always taken to be with
respect to the unscaled font size. (i.e., the font size of the parent) when
the elements font size causes automatic scaling.
Received on Monday, 17 May 2004 23:47:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:30 GMT