The "icon" property in CSS3 UI seems to not define the behavior when none of the icons in the list can be rendered by the user-agent. It would seem that defining this case is necessary to ensure interoperable implementation (read that as "I don't know what to implement, if I were to try to make this work"). Also, it is not clear what the use of the "auto" value is, since the icon that will be shown is completely arbitrary. I fear that whatever icon the first UA to market randomly picks for this others will need to follow, creating a needless de-facto standard. If there is a reason for having this value, there probably needs to be some description of what the default icon should designate on a conceptual level (eg warning icon, error icon, meaningless abstract-art icon, whatever). -BorisReceived on Wednesday, 12 May 2004 12:45:23 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:29 GMT