Hi, Dave, > The XUL box model actually accomplishes all that the %% units do and > more, with less ambiguity and with the ability to specify width and > height values that are independent of the flexing values. Flexing of > an element should actually be independent of the min-width, width, and > max-width values, so I don't think it makes sense to try to overload > flexing onto those properties. Pretty much close, but not exactly as far as I know. E.g. layout: <p>password:<input style="width:80%%"></p> cannot be achieved in XUL. Am I right? Also: <div style="margin:100%%">center</div> only by using spacers. Andrew Fedoniouk. http://terrainformatica.comReceived on Friday, 7 May 2004 21:31:20 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:29 GMT