W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2004

Re: [CSS2] Spec Typo

From: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 15:10:22 +0100
Message-Id: <F2DE15E0-9E9D-11D8-8B7C-000A957E4F00@dorward.me.uk>
To: 'www-style@w3.org' <www-style@w3.org>

On 5 May 2004, at 15:03, Davey wrote:
> Not sure if this is the right/best place to post this, but here goes. 
> If it is not, please
> feel free to point me in a better direction.
> There is a small typo in the CSS 2 Spec.
> The definition for "ridge" has "groove" spelt incorrectly (grove).
> Hope somebody fixes this minor mistake :)


      Section 8.5.3 Border style
      Under the definition of "ridge", change "grove" to "groove".

Why is it that the primary document doesn't get updated when these 
errors are found? The date based URIs would still point to the exact 
same content for purposes of citation, and it would make it much easier 
to read the specification (as it would eliminate the need to check the 
errata for what is now a rather large number of corrections).

David Dorward
Received on Wednesday, 5 May 2004 10:12:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:27:13 UTC