On 3/25/04 12:36 PM, "Jan Roland Eriksson" <jrexon@newsguy.com> wrote: > On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 11:35:53 -0800, you wrote: > >> Either browsers handle valid content correctly or not, that has nothing to >> do with DOCTYPE switching. > > You use the word "valid" in a way that leads me to beleive you are into > SGML thinking here. I meant "valid" only in terms of being valid against whatever specifications the content is based upon. You're right that the term "valid" is overloaded and may imply other aspects which I didn't mean to. Better would have been "conformant", as in, content which conforms with the appropriate specifications. Thanks, TantekReceived on Thursday, 25 March 2004 15:47:44 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:27 GMT