W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2004

Re: [css3-hyperlinks] inclusion of Clink in next WD

From: George Chavchanidze <gch@rmi.acnet.ge>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 12:48:32 -0400 (GMT)
To: www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1040311124740.3544B-100000@rmi-sun.rmi.acnet.ge>

> UA processing can simply use XSLT or behavioral extensions as I mention
CSS BE is working draft that was not updated since 1999. Thus I assume it
is droped,
and in any case as you said yourself it is more complex then Xlink.
As to XSLT I don't understand why should I use XSL if document can be
directly using CSS without any transformations. So situation is almost
you can render document using CSS, you can add images, objects etc. 
using CSS generated content and there remains the only one 
thing that you can't do - you can't follow links. Is it OK?
Style language is not just colors and font styles, 
style language is way to turn markup into user friendly page,
that can be viewed, browsed etc. And the more powerful is style language,
the more effectively you can use markup. 
Received on Thursday, 11 March 2004 03:42:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:27:12 UTC