W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > June 2004

Re: Dreams aloud

From: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:57:46 -0700
Message-ID: <008e01c45d52$915d9fb0$eb01000a@AFedoniouk>
To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, <www-style@w3.org>

> L. David Baron wrote:
>See also the following (and other messages in the threads):
>  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/1999Mar/0086.html
>  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/1999Jul/0040.html
>  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/1999Jul/0057.html

Thanks David for your links. They prove that evolution indeed is sort of

I've got ideas exlained there.
But situation is slightly different at this time: min/max'es already here.

Seems like the only way we can follow now is to declare cascading rule for
width as:

if 'width' is defined in the style definition it overrides previous value
*and discards min and max values set in previous styles in the cascading

So authors if they want to use width with constraints will be forced to
override these three all together.

Andrew Fedoniouk.
Received on Monday, 28 June 2004 17:00:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:30 GMT