After reading back and forth through a (nearly) whole thread from a few months back on this issue [1] I have decided on what I feel would be the best solution to both sides. content: replaced(url(...), height, width); such that the record of Image Ian was trying to solve with CSS could be dealt as such: img { content: replaced(attr(src, url), 50px, 50px), attr(alt), none; } or something similar. This would enable a replaced elem to be created inside the "inline" elem...which would work as expected when the inline is an anon-box as a single-replaced elem would designate (or we could always do as url() alone does for the replaced(...) alone case) This also allows re-sizing of a case such as content: url(x) url(y) url(z) "Company" url(logo); in terms of each section. Boris, Ian, does this address both concerns? Any new concerns? ...Others? ~Justin Wood [1] <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2004Feb/0290.html> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2004Apr/0116.html>Received on Thursday, 29 July 2004 02:08:23 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:31 GMT