W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2004

Re: Positioned Children of Overflowed Parents

From: Dave Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 12:26:30 -0700
Message-Id: <B3D32139-DA82-11D8-BE3F-000A95AE8B18@apple.com>
Cc: W3C Style List <www-style@w3.org>
To: Gavin Kistner <gavin@refinery.com>

Ok, I fixed this bug.   It was just a minor glitch in the positioning 
code.  Thanks again for reporting it.

dave

On Jul 20, 2004, at 12:16 PM, Dave Hyatt wrote:

>
> It should not be (assuming an explicit position is specified using 
> e.g., left/top).  This is a bug in Safari.   The opacity problem you 
> mention in the test case is a separate issue and has been fixed.
>
> Thanks for the test case.
>
> dave
>
> On Jul 20, 2004, at 11:31 AM, Gavin Kistner wrote:
>
>>
>> Would someone who knows the spec implicitly please confirm that a 
>> position:absolute child of a position:static; overflow:auto parent 
>> element should not be affected by the scrolling offset of the parent 
>> object?
>>
>> (I want to confirm that the pre-resize behavior of 
>> http://phrogz.net/CSS/positioninoverflow.html is in fact a bug in 
>> Safari.)
>> --
>> (-, /\ \/ / /\/
>>
>
Received on Tuesday, 20 July 2004 15:27:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:31 GMT