Tex Texin wrote: > No, the style sheet is defined in terms of unicode characters, but the encoding can > be anything and parsing can be in the native encoding as long as it is equivalent to > Unicode. This last part is sort of key. > If in the case of an unrecognized encoding, the parser presumed utf-8 and > looked for the usual boundary markers (@, ;, etc.) for many sheets it would do an > adequate job of parsing. Yes, but is that desirable? That would get flat-wrong results for any non-ascii-compatible encoding out there, for example... of which there are plenty. -BorisReceived on Thursday, 15 July 2004 23:18:42 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:31 GMT