W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2004

RE: [css3-page] examples in 3.3.2 (page size) are 'US-centric'(?)

From: Ernest Cline <ernestcline@mindspring.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 15:18:15 -0500
Message-ID: <410-220041530201815701@mindspring.com>
To: "BIGELOW,JIM (HP-Boise,ex1)" <jim.bigelow@hp.com>, www-style@w3.org

> [Original Message]
> From: BIGELOW,JIM (HP-Boise,ex1) <jim.bigelow@hp.com>
> After reading all the posts on this subject, I'm included to have the CSS3
> Page Media and CSS Print Profile specification require the following
> names be recognized as media names, all other media would have
> to be selected by width and height:
> letter, legal, ledger,
> a5, b5, a4, b4, a3
> Where the names are not case sensitive.

For non-East Asian uses this should be both sufficient and acceptable.
I still think that b5 and b4 will be a source of confusion for Japanese
However, since jis-b5 is just slightly larger than iso-b5 and jis-b4 is just
slightly larger than iso-b4, it shouldn't be a source of major usability
problems.  If at all feasible, I still think it would be a good idea to
with someone more knowledgeable than I am about East Asian printing
practices to make certain that we aren't ignoring commonly used Japanese
or Chinese paper sizes.  I know enough to be concerned, but not enough
to know how concerned the WG should be.

Asking about paper sizes in soc.culture.japan turned out to be a total
waste of time.  A more useless, troll-filled newsgroup I have never seen.

Since there is precedent for describing keywords using uppercase,
even tho all CSS keywords are case insignificant, it might be preferable
to give the ISO sizes as A5, B5, A4, B4, and A3. since that is the usual
form they take outside of technical specs since it has been decided
to use keywords that are less technical looking.
Received on Friday, 30 January 2004 15:19:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:27:11 UTC