On Tue, 27 Jan 2004, Jens Meiert wrote: > > Is it worth consideration, or did I miss something? -- I'm aware that the > structural pseudo classes offer a powerful set of selectors to maybe solve the > problem above, but this suggestion seems easier anyway. Your suggestion breaks a fundamental tennet of Selectors up to now, namely that the last element mentioned in the selector chain is the one that matches the selector. Personally to solve this I prefer my :matches() proposal. See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2003Apr/0146.html ...and related threads. -- Ian Hickson )\._.,--....,'``. fL U+1047E /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. http://index.hixie.ch/ `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'Received on Tuesday, 27 January 2004 21:31:53 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:25 GMT