W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2004

Re: extra pseudo-class for anchors

From: BachusII <BachusII@planet.nl>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 10:33:18 +0100
To: <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000601c3d693$9eeaf240$0ca45591@L3800C>

> That's (maybe) another problem. What if the page using the stylesheet
has the
> URL "http://example.com/foo/" and a link inside that points to the URN
> "urn:xmp:foo" (or the like, you get the idea), which could be resolved
to the
> very URL (or others)---should the pseudo-class match?

If both http://example.com/foo/ and urn:xmp:foo result in the same
response to be rendered/handled, why does it matter?
(I'll admit that at the moment I have no idea what urn:xmp:foo means but
give me an hour and a google search)

I can understand that a selfreferencing link can pose problems. (Not
exactly spider friendly for example)
Received on Friday, 9 January 2004 04:38:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:27:10 UTC