W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2004

RE: [css3-page] LCWD issue 29 -- [29] Section 8

From: BIGELOW,JIM (HP-Boise,ex1) <jim.bigelow@hp.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:48:02 -0500
Message-ID: <79417AA297C63F4EA33B68AC105464A985598D@xboi22.boise.itc.hp.com>
To: ernestcline@mindspring.com, www-style@w3.org

Earnest wrote:
> > From: BIGELOW,JIM (HP-Boise,ex1) <jim.bigelow@hp.com>
> > I agree that <angle> in the range of 0 to 360 is preferable to 
> > <integer>.
> 
> Just to be clear, I was referring to the <angle> value type from 
> CSS3 Values [1] not some new definition of <angle> that would 
> allow only degrees.
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-css3-values-20010713/#angles
> 

Thanks for the clarification.  I like the suggestion, support degrees,
radians, and grads makes sense to me.

Jim
Received on Thursday, 8 January 2004 17:48:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:25 GMT