W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2004

Re: [css3-page] Is auto a page identifier or not?

From: Etan Wexler <ewexler@stickdog.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 23:47:36 -0800
To: www-style@w3.org
Message-Id: <E0F9D1C5-6766-11D8-A256-000502CB1B77@stickdog.com>

Ernest Cline wrote to <mailto:www-style@w3.org> on 11 February 2004 in 
"Re: [css3-page] Is auto a page identifier or not?" 
(<mid:410-22004241225419187@mindspring.com>):

> 2) Deprecate page and use a different property name such as 
> 'page-name'.
[...]
> If there wasn't at least one implementation, I could see doing as Boris
> suggests and change <identifier> to something else, but there is one.
> Unless you can think of a better reason than there might be another
> keyword that would be useful without a suggestion of what it might be,
> I think it would be best to keep 'page' as either "auto | 
> <identifier>" or
> "<identifier>" for now and reserve option 2 above for when someone
> can come up with a good keyword.

We already have another keyword value for the 'page' property: 
'inherit'. So shall we shift property names?

-- 
Etan Wexler.
Received on Wednesday, 25 February 2004 02:53:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:26 GMT