W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2004

Re: [CSS21] response to issue 103

From: fantasai <fantasai@escape.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 15:47:54 -0500
Message-ID: <4036727A.5040009@escape.com>
To: Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>, www-style@w3.org

Bert Bos wrote:
>
> Your e-mail:
>     http://www.w3.org/mid/20031011130232.GA3710@tapir
>     Interaction of run-in with anonymous block boxes.
> 
> CSS WG response:
>     New text:
> 
>       A run-in box behaves as follows:
> 
>       1. If the run-in box contains a block box, the run-in box becomes
>          a block box.  
>       2. If a sibling block box (that does not float and is not
>          absolutely positioned) follows the run-in box, the run-in box
>          becomes the first inline box of the block box. A run-in
>          cannot run in to a block that already starts with a run-in or
>          that itself is a run-in.
>       3. Otherwise, the run-in box becomes a block box.

Does this handle cases A and B described in the email?
(And also http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2000May/0010.html )

~fantasai
Received on Friday, 20 February 2004 15:49:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:26 GMT