- From: fantasai <fantasai@escape.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 20:44:35 -0500
- To: www-style@w3.org
Ian Hickson wrote: > fantasai wrote: > >>s/clearance/float clearance/ > > > Changing it just in one place would be more confusing, we think (using two > terms for one concept), and changing it in multiple places would make the > text a lot harder to read, we think (and this text is already quite > verbose enough as it is). > > Since the first occurance of clearance links straight to the definition, > we really don't see that it is much of a problem. I think just changing the first occurance of the term in that section should be sufficient. Traversing links just to get that much of a clue seems a bit awkward. ~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 17 February 2004 20:46:21 UTC