W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2004

Re: [CSS21] response to issue 193

From: fantasai <fantasai@escape.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 20:44:35 -0500
Message-ID: <4032C383.5000405@escape.com>
To: www-style@w3.org

Ian Hickson wrote:
> fantasai wrote:
> 
>>s/clearance/float clearance/
> 
> 
> Changing it just in one place would be more confusing, we think (using two
> terms for one concept), and changing it in multiple places would make the
> text a lot harder to read, we think (and this text is already quite
> verbose enough as it is).
> 
> Since the first occurance of clearance links straight to the definition,
> we really don't see that it is much of a problem.

I think just changing the first occurance of the term in that section
should be sufficient. Traversing links just to get that much of a clue
seems a bit awkward.

~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 17 February 2004 20:46:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:26 GMT