Re: [CSS21] response to issue 193

Ian Hickson wrote:
> fantasai wrote:
> 
>>s/clearance/float clearance/
> 
> 
> Changing it just in one place would be more confusing, we think (using two
> terms for one concept), and changing it in multiple places would make the
> text a lot harder to read, we think (and this text is already quite
> verbose enough as it is).
> 
> Since the first occurance of clearance links straight to the definition,
> we really don't see that it is much of a problem.

I think just changing the first occurance of the term in that section
should be sufficient. Traversing links just to get that much of a clue
seems a bit awkward.

~fantasai