Boris wrote: > Actually, if I understand the definition of "pixel" in CSS > correctly, that is precisely what should NOT happen if pixels > are implemented correctly. In CSS "pixel" does not refer to > a dot but rather to a solid angle in the field of view. > Therefore a "300px" image should have the same physical > dimensions (as measured with a ruler) no matter what the > medium, as long as the viewing distance is held constant > (modulo the possily low resolution of the imaging device, actually). > Thank you, I stand corrected. - JimReceived on Tuesday, 17 February 2004 15:59:33 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:26 GMT