W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 2004

Re: [CSS3] 'outline' shorthand property

From: Justin Wood (Callek) <116057@bacon.qcc.mass.edu>
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 16:01:17 -0500
Message-ID: <41D0781D.1040907@bacon.qcc.mass.edu>
To: David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com>
CC: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>, www-style@w3.org

Of course Dave, but as I read it proposed outline-width _must_ be 
specified for offset to be included, and offset _must_ always follow 
outline-width to be acheived.

~Justin Wood (Callek)

David Hyatt wrote:

>
> You can't disambiguate width and offset, since they can both (for 
> example) be pixel values.  In general the values of a shorthand need 
> to be distinguishable, so that it's always clear which property each 
> value in the shorthand represents.
>
> dave
> (hyatt@apple.com)
>
> On Dec 27, 2004, at 12:10 PM, Andrew Fedoniouk wrote:
>
>>
>> Currently  'outline' shorthand property defined [1] as
>> [ <'outline-color'> || <'outline-style'> || <'outline-width'> ] | 
>> inherit
>>
>> This definition does not include 'outline-offset'.
>>
>> I propose to define it as:
>>
>> [ <'outline-color'> || <'outline-style'> || <'outline-width'> [
>> <'outline-offset'> ]?  ] | inherit
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Andrew Fedoniouk
>> http://terrainformatica.com
>>
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/CR-css3-ui-20040511/#outline
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
Received on Monday, 27 December 2004 21:02:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:35 GMT