W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2004

RE: [css3-text] Tibetan tsek justification

From: Michel Suignard <michelsu@windows.microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 11:05:34 -0700
Message-ID: <84DD35E3DD87D5489AC42A59926DABE908810E6C@WIN-MSG-10.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
To: "Etan Wexler" <ewexler@stickdog.com>
Cc: <www-style@w3.org>

Oh well, never mind, sometimes I should read the sender text until the
end. ;-)

Michel 

-----Original Message-----
From: Michel Suignard 
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2004 10:40 AM
To: 'Etan Wexler'
Cc: www-style@w3.org
Subject: RE: [css3-text] Tibetan tsek justification

I would recommend folks interested in Tibetan justification to have a
look at chapter 9.11 in the Unicode 4.0 book, it contains a good
description of Tibetan justification and it is not covered by CSS3 text
so far.

Link at http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode4.0.0/ch09.pdf

Michel 

-----Original Message-----
From: Etan Wexler [mailto:ewexler@stickdog.com]
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2004 1:11 AM
To: www-style@w3.org; Michel Suignard
Subject: [css3-text] Tibetan tsek justification

When justifying Tibetan texts, is it acceptable under any of the
'text-justify' values to use tsek marks as justification? Is this
traditional method even used in electronically composed texts? Is it
possible, before the CSS3 Text module reaches Proposed Recommendation,
to add a note explaining the eventual verdict?

Does anybody care?

(For those who don't follow the tsek question, I refer you to The
Unicode Standard 4.0.1, section 9.11, "Tibetan"; see the subsection,
"Traditional Text Formatting and Line Justification".
<http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode4.0.0/ch09.pdf>)

--
Etan Wexler.
Received on Friday, 6 August 2004 14:06:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:32 GMT