- From: Justin Wood <jw6057@bacon.qcc.mass.edu>
- Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 23:06:16 -0400
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: W3C Style List <www-style@w3.org>
Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: >* fantasai wrote: > > >>Also, it seems we haven't defined fallbacks very well here. >>If the resource at the URL cannot be loaded as a replaced >>element, the content value should fail and fall back, not >>load half-baked strings. >> >> content: "Welcome to " url(welcome.png) "!"; >> >> > >That's a rather bad example, welcome.png is content not style here. > > > > Does it not change the fact that *SOME* users of CSS will abandon the "reasons for CSS" and mix content and style anyway, as ALREADY has been done to a large degree on a large number of websites. (For example see how many professional company websites follow even Level A Conformance) We need a "Defined Fallback" for such a case! ~Justin Wood
Received on Wednesday, 4 August 2004 23:08:40 UTC