Re: content: url() is bad

staffan.mahlen@comhem.se wrote:
> Aha sorry, i didn't realise quirks could possibly affect something 
> like this (is "replacedness" of broken images really a major 
> backwards-compatibility issue?).

Think spacer.gif images that are 404 (very common, actually).  If you 
replace them with an inline representation of the alt text (not even 
usually empty!)....

-Boris