The specifity syntax used for the 'style' attribute profile examples [1] seems to be irritating, since 'a+=0 b+=0 c+=1' might be interpreted as equivalent to 'a+=0 b+=0 c+=1 d+=0' (due to [2]) -- and which thus (consequently, but misleadingly) seems to result in the following specifity for the first example: a=0, b=0, c=1, d=0 which is (CMIIW) wrong since it's a=1, b=0, c=0, d=1 Nonetheless (if I'm correct or not), I propose to revise these specifity examples and to use at least the 'a - d' notation, and it might be helpful to add the /resulting/ specifity (which AFAIK must include 'a=1' for the 'style' attribute), too. Best regards, Jens. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/css-style-attr#cascading [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/cascade.html#specificity -- Jens Meiert Interface Architect http://meiert.com/Received on Thursday, 15 April 2004 06:12:25 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:29 GMT