- From: <staffan.mahlen@comhem.se>
- Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 21:21:57 +0200
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On 14 Apr 2004 at 16:59, Ian Hickson wrote: > > > > How do you make: > > <img src=".."> > > <table>... > > </img> > > > > work? Thats a rather fundamental difference to me. > > This seems like quibbling. The images in the cases above have just plain > text as replacement text. <img> handles that. It might be quibbling, but I thought we just established that img does not act the way you want in two out of three tested current implementations (and when testing Mozilla the behavior differs when supplied a size in which case it also seems to be kept as replaced). Since HTML offers a better alternative than the proposed CSS solution i think the point was at least somewhat interesting when discussing modifying a rather fundamental CSS definition. > > Was "replaced elements" a typo? > > No. Then i suppose you do see CSS more or less creating elements in the document tree as parts of a value for a property. As you know by now i think that might be a misstake. /Staffan
Received on Wednesday, 14 April 2004 15:22:39 UTC