W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2004

Re: content: url() is bad

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 13:01:04 -0500
Message-ID: <407D7C60.3020609@mit.edu>
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Cc: www-style@w3.org

Ian Hickson wrote:
>  D. Do something that hasn't yet been suggested.

Something that was suggested was "content" to generate kids (acts as B), 
and "replacement" to make a replaced element.

If replacement is set, content computes to something appropriate (there 
is precedent with the way float affects display, eg).

I _think_ that's more intuitive for authors.  But maybe I'm wrong and 
the interaction of the two properties will confuse them....

Received on Wednesday, 14 April 2004 14:06:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:29 GMT