W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2004

Re: content: url() is bad

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 12:21:15 -0500
Message-ID: <407D730B.9000107@mit.edu>
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Cc: www-style@w3.org

Perhaps I did a poor job of describing my issue with the "it's a 
replaced element or not" proposal... my problem is that it violates the 
principle of least surprise for authors.  This is a problem that CSS 
suffers from heavily in general -- predicting the rendering of anything 
but the most trivial CSS is pretty much impossibly without studying the 
spec for weeks first.

Again, I can't offer a better alternative.  But I disagree with the 
assertion made by Ian earlier in this thread that this is a usability 
win.  Anything that exhibits erratic (from an author's point of view) 
behavior is a usability loss.

Received on Wednesday, 14 April 2004 13:26:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:29 GMT