W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2004

Re: content: url() is bad

From: csant <csant@csant.info>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 18:28:37 +0200
To: "www-style.w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <opr6cqpz0jd84skq@csant.info>

> how *would* this be more or less compatible with a screenreader?

Isn't this addressed by CSS3 generated content <URL:  
http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-content/#inserting3 >:

content: url(1), url(2), url(3), "contents";

Where "contents" is the fallback text that is displayed if the URIs fail  
to be rendered.


I was the shadow of the waxwing slain
By the false azure in the windowpane;
~~~ John Francis Shade
Received on Monday, 12 April 2004 12:31:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:27:12 UTC