On Friday, April 2, 2004, 12:56:19 AM, Philip wrote: PT> David Woolley wrote: >>>to deactivate 'blink' but that would also deactivate underlines, >>>overlines, etc. which is not desirable if I just want blink free >>>web pages. >>> >> >> >> Seems to me that there is a bug in CSS if blink is something you >> want to disable orthogonally to other text decorations. PT> Why ? If the user suffers from epilepsy, disabling "blink" PT> (but not disabling underline or whatever) would seem to be PT> an eminently sensible decision. Blink is not required to be supported for conformance. It strikes me that a user agent could have a user preference whether blink is honored or not. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Chair, W3C SVG Working Group Member, W3C Technical Architecture GroupReceived on Friday, 2 April 2004 01:14:27 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:28 GMT