W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2003

Re: list-style-position

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 18:00:50 +0000 (UTC)
To: Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>
Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.56.0309111758180.21065@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>

On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, Tantek [ISO-8859-1] «elik wrote:
>
> Yet more evidence that defining (or at least explaining) inline-block as
> being formatted like a replaced element works and makes sense for folks.

Oh I don't disagree.

It's not really what I want for ::marker though.

For ::marker I really just want a normal 'inline' box, except that in the
non-replaced case, 'width' has to apply to it, with 'text-align' deciding
how stuff is aligned in the resulting box. I also need to define how line
breaks and overflow are handled in that case.

So 'inline-block' works except that it doesn't interact with the line box
using 'line-height', which I think is important for ::marker.

-- 
Ian Hickson                                      )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
U+1047E                                         /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
http://index.hixie.ch/                         `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 11 September 2003 14:00:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:23 GMT